Don’t be concerned an excessive amount of about the doom and gloom predictions you hear in regards to the nation’s actual estate market: house value costs are dropping, the bubble is bursting, housing’s not promoting, and many others. They want the Unbiased and Transparent Assessment of the 10% cost that MPs referred to as for within the 2014 debate and it needs to incorporate sight of the location owners certified audited accounts. At the last All Get together Parliamentary Group Meeting for Park Properties; the Minister Gavin Barlow mentioned that the 10% fee would not be part of the 2017 overview.
Concerning Infrastructure; are they not aware (or do they choose to forget) that when the location owner units up a park and provides many park houses that he makes a large profit on the preliminary sale of every residence on the outset and then continues to get an revenue of 10% every time it’s sold.
The Call for Evidence is also searching for proof on the suitable index for use when carrying out a pitch fee assessment (CPI or RPI); whether ‘fit and correct’ controls need to be applied in the sector; and views on the Park Properties Working Group’s recommendations on how local authorities will be assisted additional in their licensing features.
While I believe the scope of the 2017 assessment is to take a look at the effectiveness of the Mobile Homes Act 2013, might I respectfully convey to your attention the park houses debate in the House of Commons on 30th October 2014 when all MPs unanimously voted for an Impartial and Clear Overview of the 10% fee cost.
There is a clear and constant divide between the views of residents and park house owners, with most residents supporting the reduction or abolition of the fee paid, while all web site homeowners wish to see it retained at the present maximum fee of 10%.